May 18, 2008

Blogging at the Beach 2008: A Preview

Dreamstime_970883_2 I will be attending the Georgia Family Law Institute again this year. The seminar and event, the 26th annual program, will be held at the Sandestin Beach Hilton from Thursday, May 22 through Saturday, May 24, 2008.

The topics of the seminar presentations this year are:

THURSDAY, MAY 22, 2008
DIRECT EXAMINATION OF BUSINESS VALUATION EXPERT
NATIONAL TRENDS IN FAMILY LAW
DAUBERT CHALLENGES OF EXPERT WITNESSES BEFORE AND DURING TRIAL
SMALL TOWN DOMESTIC RELATIONS PRACTICE:

FRIDAY, MAY 23, 2008
HOT TIPS FROM THE EXPERTS
Stick With What Works
Statistics
Cell-Phone Tower Tracking
Integrating Third- Party Discovery
Personal Injury Proceeds in Divorce
How to Seal the Deal
How to Keep the G.A.L. from Killing Your Case
Railroad Retirement Division in Divorce
Waiver and Preservation of Attorney-Client Privilege
Virtual Visitation
Requests for Admissions in Domestic Cases 
ARE YOU SMARTER THAN AN APPELLATE JUDGE? INTELLIGENT PRACTICE IN THE SUPREME COURT AND COURT OF APPEALS
UNIFORM FAMILY LAWS AND GEORGIA: OPPORTUNITIES AWAIT
ATTORNEYS FEES IN DOMESTIC CASES: ETHICS AND PRACTICE

SATURDAY, MAY 24, 2008 
OUT OF THE KETTLE AND INTO THE FIRE:  WHEN DOMESTIC RELATIONS CASES BECOME CRIMINAL CASES
GEORGIA’S NEW CHILD CUSTODY STATUTE (H.B. 369) – PROVING THE “FACTORS”
REAL ESTATE ISSUES IN DIVORCE
CASE LAW UPDATE AND RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

Related Posts (about last year's event):

2007 Georgia Family Law Institute

Blogging from the Beach: Day 1

Blogging from the Beach: Day 2

May 13, 2008

The House You Owned Before The Marriage

Dreamstime_3387612 If a married couple gets divorced, and one of the spouses owned their home before the marriage, the house is part marital property and part nonmarital property.

The value of the house at the time of the divorce can be divided into several categories:

(1) the equity the owning spouse had in the home at the time of the marriage (nonmarital);

(2) the amount the couple paid off on mortgage principal while living together as husband and wife (marital);

(3) the appreciation in the value of the house over the course of the marriage that can be attributed to the owning spouse's premarital equity (nonmarital);

(4) the appreciation in the value of the house over the course of the marriage that CANNOT be attributed to the owning spouse's premarital equity (marital); and

(5) the increase in value of the house that can be attributed to home improvements that the parties made during the marriage (marital).

Most of the time, the components of the house's value cannot be objectively determined or fixed without either the reasonable compromise of the spouses or the expertise of a neutral appraiser.

SOURCE: Minnesota Divorce and Family Law Blog

May 12, 2008

Wife Sues Husband for Share of Secret $600K Lottery Win

Dreamstime_4849326 It was a secret that surely could not be kept for long. But Arnim Ramdass allegedly tried.

The airline mechanic, 52, disconnected the phone line at home and forbade his stay-at-home wife, Donna Campbell, 48, to watch television, Campbell claims in a lawsuit. Eventually, however, she learned the truth: Ramdass, along with 16 other mechanics at Miami International Airport, had won a $19 million lottery jackpot. Split among the 17 workers, it amounted to a $600,000 lump-sum payday, before taxes, for each of them, reports the Miami Herald (story reprinted below)

In her suit, Campbell claims Ramdass fraudulently conspired to conceal the lottery payout from her, and contends she is entitled to a 50 percent share of her husband's take from the winning ticket, because it was purchased with marital assets.

Once the lawsuit is resolved, the newspaper says, she plans to divorce him.

See the lawsuit here.

SOURCE: ABAJournal.com in a story by Martha Neil 

Continue reading "Wife Sues Husband for Share of Secret $600K Lottery Win" »

May 09, 2008

7 Roadblocks to Successful Mediation

Dreamstime_345538 Mediation is a very popular and widespread process used to resolve disputes, especially in divorce cases. In many places . . ., mediation is virtually a requirement before a case can go to trial. The reason is obvious — it works! My observation is that mediated cases settle about 90% of the time, or more.

For mediation to be successful, it takes a good, well-trained mediator. In Texas [and here in Georgia], we normally have attorneys present and participating with the parties in the mediation; some other states often have the parties attend mediation without attorneys. Both systems obviously can be effective. Success, however, is not guaranteed and should not be taken for granted. Here are seven problems that can prevent a successful outcome from mediation.

1. Lack of preparation by one or both sides. The parties need to have all the information and records at hand so they can make intelligent decisions. It’s also very helpful for both parties to have thought through their personal goals, needs and interests so they know what they should try to accomplish in the negotiations.

2. Unrealistic expectations. If one party has goals or ideas that are very unrealistic, agreement would be unlikely. It is normal for the parties to disagree about things, but sometimes there is no way to accomplish what one of the parties wants. An attorney should work with the client to help them reasonably define and describe what they want to end up with. If a party demands 80% of all the assets because the spouse has had an affair or drank too much or abandoned the family, usually the case is very unlikely to settle. As the Rolling Stones said, ‘You can’t always get what you want.’ The parties need to be realistic and keep in mind the costs of not settling.

3. Lack of commitment by a party. If one party or both don’t take the process seriously or don’t want to settle, there won’t be an agreement. Both parties need to see and feel the advantages to themselves from a settlement. Without commitment, the parties won’t stay in the compromise mode long enough to settle. They can easily become discouraged if there is not a quick, painless settlement.

4. Inability of a party to make a decision. I have seen situations where we have waited two hours or more for the other party to respond to a changed settlement proposal that wasn’t particularly complex. Some people don’t handle stress well and some don’t like to make quick decisions. The parties should learn in advance how the mediation process works and how decisions are made. They need to learn to approach the process as if it were an impersonal business deal. Participants should expect to face choices and they need to understand that they probably won’t be happy with everything that happens at mediation. Even highly educated people used to making tough decisions affecting others sometimes have hard times making decisions in mediation.

5. Positional bargaining. People who begin negotiations without clearly defining their goals and needs will usually begin by staking out a territory or percentage as a starting point and leave themselves room to compromise. Sometimes, both parties figure out a middle ground for a target and figuratively both take ten paces backward before negotiating. Some people want a percentage of the property, regardless of what their needs are. For example, many husbands will insist on a 50-50 split and some wives will choose a starting point of 70% or 65% of the assets, when it may be that certain assets would be preferable for one party, such as cash in the bank (with no tax consequences) versus funds in a retirement plan (with penalties for early withdrawal plus income taxes for the amount paid). Positional bargaining can make for easier negotiations, but the results may not be very helpful to either party.

6. A mentally ill participant. There are, of course, varying degrees of impairment from mental illnesses. Medication and counseling are often helpful for a patient. Sometimes having a close family member or friend present during the mediation can help the party be in a frame of mind to negotiate effectively. Without extra support and/or meds, a mentally ill party can scuttle the effort to settle.

7. A mediator perceived as biased for one side. Unless both parties have confidence in the quality and neutrality of the mediator, it is unlikely that the mediation will be successful. Some parties don’t trust a mediator who is a male or one who is a female. The location of the mediation or the mediator’s office may produce distrust by a party. If the mediator is seen as a friend of the other attorney or party, the mediator will probably not be acceptable. Attorneys should make sure that the mediator is someone who will be acceptable to both parties.

There are other potential pitfalls for mediation, but these are some of the major ones. If you are planning to go to mediation, you should work diligently in advance to be prepared, committed and ready to decide. Keep an open mind throughout the process so you have the best chance for success.

Source for Post Divorce and Family Law in Tarrant County and Divorce Help Network

April 30, 2008

Web Histories Playing Larger Role in Divorce Proceedings

Lipstick on the collar? One too many late nights at the office? Internet browsing histories?

Divorce lawyers are seeing an increase in the number of cases that cite Web logs as evidence, according to the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers.

About 79-percent of divorce attorneys polled by the Academy reported an increase in the number of cases using Internet browsing histories during divorce proceedings in the past five years, while 44-percent cited an increase in the use of spyware to gather evidence.

"Many spouses will use the Internet in order to act anonymously, but in many ways it's the most public thing someone can do," James Hennenhoefer, president of the AAML, said in a statement. "Internet activity can provide valuable glimpses into the kinds of hidden activities that a husband or wife might be trying to conceal and spyware programs can help to make this kind of monitoring extremely easy to conduct."

Evidently, typing things like "how to cheat without getting caught" into Google, signing yourself up for a marriedbutlooking.com account, or writing up one too many "casual encounters" posts on Craigslist is not advisable if you'd prefer to emerge from divorce court with your bank account intact.

Think about that when you're taking advantage of the open bar at your friends' weddings this summer. Forget the blenders and the Williams Sonoma gift cards. It's all about the tracking software. Ah, romance.

SOURCE: AppScout

April 27, 2008

Domestic violence | It's not just physical abuse

Yesterday, John P. Tassinari shot his wife, Barbara, multiple times with two 45-caliber handguns in the driveway of their Quincy, Massachusetts home. She died at the scene. She left two children, one son who is 10 and a 1-year-old from the marriage to Tassinari.

John Tassinari was described as follows by Barbara's family:

  • He was a control freak who used a cellphone to keep tabs on his wife.
  • He was also "infamously obsessive. He would need his hair shaved every Friday, he would wear shorts every day throughout the year."
  • He made sure his wife did not have any cash, and would demand to see receipts for every purchase she made.
  • He called her frequently - dozens of times during the day - to ask her where she was and when she'd be home.

Barbara's family said that she was planning to leave her husband, but not for another man. They said that she wanted out of her marriage because of his obsessive, controlling ways. Her father stated that he had never seen any signs of domestic abuse and that he'd have removed his daughter from the home if he'd seen abuse.

Domestic abuse isn't just physical violence

Unfortunately, not enough people realize that domestic abuse is not always physical abuse. Barbara's story is one that can help others to understand, to recognize and to protect themselves and their loved ones from domestic abuse.

Domestic abuse can be physical abuse or it can be the type of conduct that Barbara Tassinari experienced. The following has been defined as domestic abuse: [NOTE: The abuser is usually, but not always a male. However, to avoid repeated "him/her" construction, I have used female pronouns below.]

  • Using economic abuse (e.g., making her ask for money, giving her an allowance, taking her money, making her account for even minor purchases)
  • Using coercion and threats
  • Using intimidation (e.g., making her afraid using looks, action, gestures)
  • Using emotional abuse (e.g., belittling her, calling her names, making her feel guilty)
  • Using isolation (e.g., controlling her activities, limiting her contacts with others)
  • Using the children (e.g., threatening to take the children away, making her feel guilty about the children)
  • Using male privilege (e.g. treating her like an inferior, making all the big decisions)
  • (Minimizing, denying, blaming (e.g., denying that abuse happened, blaming her for causing the abuse)

For greater detail, see the Power and Control Wheel developed by the Domestic Abuse Intervention Project, Duluth, MN. This Wheel from the same source shows the detrimental effects that domestic violence has on the children living in the household.

Lawyers, family members and friends can help

Those in closest contact with a victim of domestic abuse need to know that research shows that a woman is most at risk of harm when she is planning to leave an abusive relationship. These are some helpful ways lawyers, family and friends can help a woman recognize domestic abuse in a relationship or marriage:

  • Show her the materials on this Blog
  • Talk with her and help her identify specific behaviors that constitute domestic abuse
  • Help her devise a safety plan for leaving
  • Help her get a secure email address and learn how to use the Internet safely. (See earlier posts on this Blog about Internet security)

Earlier articles on this Blog concerning Domestic Violence are found here.

Other resources

Handbook: A handbook to assist lawyers to identify and help clients who are domestic violence victims from the American Bar Association

Also from the ABA: Tips on Devising a Safety Plan

To read the Boston Globe article about Barbara Tassinari (also reprinted below)

SOURCE FOR POST: Updates in Michigan Family Law by Jeanne Hannah

Continue reading "Domestic violence | It's not just physical abuse" »

April 26, 2008

'Bad Dads' Reality Show Would Get Child Support Delinquents to Cough Up Cash

A new reality show that could get the go-ahead on FOX plans to hunt down deadbeat dads and hit them up for the child support they owe.

FOX confirmed it has requested the pilot of the program tentatively titled "Bad Dads" by the network that has churned out such reality successes as "The Moment of Truth" and "Cops."

"We ordered the pilot for review — that's it," FOX Broadcasting Co. spokesman Scott Grogin told FOXNews.com. 3Ball Productions, of "Beauty and the Geek" and "For Love or Money" fame, is behind the project.

National Child Support Center Director Jim Durham will play the impoverished-mom savior/deadbeat-dad cop figure, according to The Hollywood Reporter. He'll track down the support payment delinquents and ultimately face off with them while the cameras roll.

The pilot will follow the story of a struggling mother and her high-rolling ex-husband, whom Durham finds and confronts at his country club, according to the Reporter.

"(Durham) calls them on the phone and gives them the chance to do the right thing," executive producer JD Roth told the industry trade publication. "Of course, those calls are never met with anything but yelling. Then he ... finds out what kind of assets they have and makes their lives miserable.... He will squeeze them until the women get paid."

SOURCE: FoxNews.com

April 23, 2008

Bynum discusses marriage on "Divorce Court"

Televangelist Juanita Bynum acknowledges thoughts of suicide and says she no longer wants to remain married to her estranged husband in an upcoming two-part episode of the reality television show "Divorce Court."

In episodes scheduled to air Thursday and Friday, Bynum also weighs in on a case involving alleged domestic violence. The Associated Press obtained a transcript with excerpts of the show.

Bynum told Judge Lynn Toler - who hears cases on the syndicated show distributed by Twentieth Television - that she saw signs of trouble in her marriage to Thomas W. Weeks III before the Aug. 21 incident that ended in a physical altercation in a hotel parking lot outside of Atlanta.

"I was just trying to make it work because I don't like losing relationships," Bynum said. "All of this just kept getting swept under the rug ... So you begin to adapt to a very wrong and very unhealthy marriage."

Weeks pleaded guilty on March 11 to assaulting Bynum and was sentenced to three years' probation. At the sentencing hearing, he also addressed his wife, who sat in the second row of the courtroom gallery. The two later left the courthouse together.

Prosecutors alleged that Weeks beat Bynum - a prominent televangelist whose message of women's empowerment resonated with thousands of followers - in the parking lot of an Atlanta hotel.

According to a police report, Bynum told officers that Weeks "choked her, pushed her down, kicked and stomped her ... until a bellman pulled him off of her."

As a condition of his sentence, Weeks must undergo violence and anger counseling and complete 200 hours of community service that cannot be church-related. He had been barred previously from communicating with Bynum, but that restriction has been lifted. His record will be cleared if he completes the terms of his sentence.

When asked whether she and Weeks were planning a reconciliation, Bynum said she was "done."

"I can't speak for him, but I no longer want the marriage," she told Toler.

Bynum said she would always love Weeks, but made a decision to "love me more."

Weeks has said that the couple had discussed reconciliation as late as August, but his divorce attorney, Randy Kessler, said on Tuesday that the divorce is moving forward and headed toward trial. A mediation date is scheduled for May 13.

"Reconciliation is not in the works and not even being discussed now," Kessler said, adding that the show appearance could affect the mediation.

The couple wed in a million-dollar, televised ceremony in 2002 and together wrote "Teach Me How to Love You: The Beginnings."

The couple separated in June and they have no children together. Bynum filed for divorce from Weeks a month after the attack, citing "cruel treatment" and saying the marriage was "irretrievably broken."

The televangelist was also asked about rumors circulating on the Internet that she tried to commit suicide.

"Suicide crossed my mind ... You know, I felt hopeless," Bynum said. "I didn't because the name Bynum represents a legacy of people that have gone before me and had I done that I would have given too much power to an individual to not just wipe me out but to wipe out the integrity of the legacy I was born in."

Bynum said she briefly feared her legacy - and particularly her ministry - was in jeopardy, but no longer feels that way.

"If all that I have become in 25 years does not properly define who I am to the people that follow my ministry then there is no need for me to try to explain it."

Bynum is a former hairdresser and flight attendant who became a Pentecostal evangelist, author and gospel singer. Weeks is the founder of Global Destiny churches.

After the incident, Bynum vowed to become an advocate for domestic abuse prevention.

In the "Divorce Court" episodes, she observes and weighs in on a case involving domestic violence. When asked what advice she had for women in situations similar to hers, she said, "I have to make a decision ... to take the love that I had for him with me."

Toler said the show doesn't typically deal with domestic violence, but she saw a unique opportunity to reach some of her most loyal viewers, Southern black women.

"Here you have a woman who is very famous and who speaks to my audience," Toler said. "No one would ever think that she would be in that circumstance."

She said she thinks that viewers will likely be surprised by Bynum's lack of anger and her candor about her own situation.

"She was very honest about how far she fell," Toler said. "It's a tough situation anyway, and to do it in a fishbowl ... I think she handled it with a lot of grace and aplomb."

SOURCE: Ledger-Enquirer.com in an AP story by Errin Haines

April 16, 2008

Quit fighting -- get a postnuptial agreement

Can a piece of paper save a marriage? One suburban Boston couple figured it was worth trying so they entered into a legal agreement to manage a major source of tension in their relationship - money.

The couple, in their late 50s, met in college, dated for six years, married and had two children. And they fought constantly over their finances.

The husband and wife, who asked to remain anonymous, had taken out two mortgages on their home and spent inheritance money to pay down debt from the husband's consulting business.

"I would lie awake at night thinking we're going to lose the house and lose everything we ever worked for," says the wife, who teaches at a local university. "This was with me 24-7."

She valued stability; he saw debt as a means of building his business. Several marriage counselors couldn't help them come to terms with their different attitudes toward money.

Then they came across an article about marital mediation, and it mentioned postnuptial agreements.

"It's the same concept as a prenuptial agreement," says Los Angeles attorney Scott Weston, co-author of "I Do, You Do ... But Just Sign Here: A Quick and Easy Guide to Cohabitation, Prenuptial and Postnuptial Agreements."

"Instead of being done before a marriage, it's done during a marriage," he says.

Postnups, while much less common than prenuptial agreements, are gaining in popularity. Nearly 50 percent of attorneys polled by the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers reported an increase in the number of postnups from 2002 to 2007.

The agreements usually are used to settle financial issues, says Weston, whose high-profile clients have included Robert Iger, chief executive of the Walt Disney Company, as well as author Terry McMillan and boxer Oscar de la Hoya.

Postnups might be used to determine who owns assets, set a budget for household expenses or remove a business from the table in the event of a divorce. Couples also have used them to decide such things as how often the mother-in-law gets to visit or how many boys-only weekends the husband gets to take.

'I was able to breathe easier'

A postnuptial or mediated agreement can help save a couple's relationship -- if that's their goal.

"In cases where couples want to stay married, it can apply very efficiently," says Cambridge, Massachusetts, attorney John A. Fiske. "If they don't want to stay married, it's hopeless."

The Boston couple, who had been married 30 years, fell in the former camp. Fiske helped them put into writing a mutually acceptable financial plan. They agreed to transfer their house into the wife's name, both to address her fear of losing the asset and to insulate it from the husband's business debts, and to split the mortgage and other household expenses.

That was 18 months ago, and they credit the post-nuptial agreement with helping them become a mutually supportive couple again.

"In my case, I wanted financial security -- not necessarily a new BMW every year, but to feel some financial security," she says. "What he wanted was emotional support from me."

The agreement largely has quelled their arguments, they say, even though the husband's consulting business is still between $150,000 and $200,000 in debt.

"I don't think the issue has ever totally gone away," the wife says, "but I feel like I was able to breathe easier... without this being in the forefront all of the time."

Most couples do use the postnups as a blueprint for an eventual divorce, according to Elinor Robin, a Boca Raton, Florida, conflict strategist and mediator. But she thinks successful mediation can reveal the potential to save a marriage.

"The very process of working on this arrangement is a positive exercise for most couples," Robin says. "People will say (a postnup) ruins the romance, it ruins the love. If you can't have difficult discussions, that's a death knell for a marriage."

Postnup takes three lawyers

Both husband and wife should have a postnup reviewed by their own lawyers or it's not likely to withstand a legal test. For the Boston couple, that meant $5,000 in fees: Fiske drew up the agreement and then they each hired individual lawyers review it.

Getting a second opinion also allows the couple to make sure the terms are right for them. The husband's lawyer advised him against signing over the house, but he says he trusted his wife and felt it was the right move.

"I was told she could walk off with the house and leave (me) in the cold," he says. "I viewed it as, I had used up my amount of equity in the house with the amount of debt I had. It wasn't (my wife's) fault. I would rather have the debt on my shoulders and not have the emotional problems."

Both view their postnup as the reason they made it to their 30th wedding anniversary.

"We both feel it saved our marriage," the wife says. "It didn't make our problems go away, but it allowed us to keep going as a couple." 

SOURCE: CNN.com

Angry wife tries divorce-by-YouTube tactic

A New York woman involved in a divorce battle has taken to the popular video sharing site YouTube to spill secrets about her husband, his family, and even their intimate life.

Tricia Walsh-Smith lashes out at her husband, Broadway executive Philip Smith, in a teary and furious clip that's already netted nearly 150,000 hits.

Walsh-Smith goes through their wedding album on camera, accuses her husband of trying to evict her out of their apartment, and even makes embarrassing claims about their intimate life.

Her lawyer says she acted out of passion and is a "victim who is holding her head up," though he wasn't representing her when she made the video.

Her husband's lawyers say they're "kind of appalled."

Other divorce experts worry this could spell bad news for Walsh-Smith. They say the clip probably won't help her in front of a judge.

SOURCE: WLOS.com

SEE THE YOUTUBE VIDEO HERE

Updated report from MSNBC.com:

We're the YouTube Generation, living in the YouTube Era, in a YouTube World. And now we apparently have a YouTube Divorce.

Some prominent New York divorce lawyers couldn't think of another case where a spouse — in this instance, the wife of a major Broadway theater operator — had taken to YouTube to spill the secrets of a marriage in an apparent effort to gain leverage and humiliate the other side.

"This is absolutely a new step, and I think it's scary," said Bonnie Rabin, a divorce lawyer who has handled high-profile cases. "People used to worry about getting on Page Six (the gossip page of the New York Post.) But this? It brings the concept of humiliation to a whole new level."

In a tearful and furious YouTube video with close to 150,000 hits to date, former actress and playwright ("Bonkers") Tricia Walsh-Smith lashes out against her husband, Philip Smith, president of the Shubert Organization, the largest theater owner on Broadway.

She goes through their wedding album on camera, describing family members as "bad" or "evil" or "nasty," and talks about how her husband is allegedly trying to evict her from their luxury apartment. She also makes embarrassing claims regarding their intimate life, and then calls his office on camera to repeat those claims to a stunned assistant.

Famed divorce attorney Raoul Felder, called for comment on the video, termed the whole thing "funny, but there's also sadness. This is a victim who is holding her head up. I think she comes off well."

Then again, Felder allowed that he is now representing Walsh-Smith — though he wasn't when she made the YouTube video.

As for Smith, his office said he had no comment and his lawyers said they didn't, either — "other than that we're kind of appalled."

"I don't think it's the kind of thing people should be doing, and it's the kind of thing judges frown upon," said Norman Sheresky, a partner in the matrimonial law firm Sheresky Aronson Mayesfsky & Sloan, which Walsh-Smith mentions in her video. Asked if he had ever seen a spouse use YouTube to fire a salvo in a divorce battle, Sherefsky replied, "Jamais de la vie." (Translation: Never.)

Felder explained that his client was "acting out of passion." He also called the prenuptial agreement she'd signed with her husband, who is a quarter-century older than her, "stupid."

So why did his client sign? "Why do women sign these things? Love is blind, and sometimes it is deaf and dumb, too," Felder said. The video, he added, was the act of a powerless person, and "revolutions are made by powerless people."

Does that mean divorce-by-YouTube is a true revolution? Rabin, the matrimonial lawyer, sure hopes not.

For one thing, she says, this could come back to haunt Walsh-Smith. "Judges make decisions partly on (a person's) judgment," she says. "She could hurt herself with this." Not to mention the threat of a defamation case from the other side.

More broadly, she asks, where does it end? "Over the last few years we've had to deal with emails getting into the press, emails that nobody thought would end up as Exhibit A. But throwing your secrets onto YouTube for the whole world to see — and comment on! That brings it to a whole new level."

Or, in Felder's words: "There's no such thing as a private life anymore."

SOURCE: MSNBC.com in an AP story by Jocelyn Noveck

April 12, 2008

The Children's Passport Issuance Alert Program

The following information is from the website of the U.S. State Department:

The Children’s Passport Issuance Alert Program (CPIAP) is a service for the parents and legal guardians of minor children. It enables the Department of State’s Office of Children’s Issues to notify a parent or court ordered legal guardian, when requested, before issuing a U.S. passport for his or her child. The parent, legal guardian, legal representatives, or the court of competent jurisdiction must submit a written request for entry of a child’s name into the program to the Office of Children’s Issues.

Request Entry of a Child into CPIAP

Passport Issuance to Children

A person applying for a passport for a child under 16 must show that both parents consent to the issuance or that the applying parent has sole authority to obtain the passport. Passport applications made in the U.S. and at consular offices abroad will both be covered by the new law. Exceptions to this requirement may be made in special family circumstances or exigent circumstances necessitating the immediate travel of the child.

Once a passport is issued, its use is not tracked or controlled by the Department of State. There are no exit controls for American citizens leaving the United States. If you believe that your child may be abducted internationally, immediately contact the Office of Children’s Issues and inform appropriate law enforcement officials.

Information regarding the issuance of a passport to a minor is available to either parent, regardless of custody rights, as long as the requesting parents’ rights have not been terminated. The Department of State’s Children’s Passport Issuance Alert Program is a program to alert us when an application for a United States passport is made. This is not a program for tracking the use of a passport. This program can be used to inform a parent or a court when an application for a United States passport is executed on behalf of a child. The alert program generally remains in effect until each child turns 18. It is very important that parents keep us informed in writing of any changes to contact information and legal representation. Failure to notify CA/OCS/CI of a current address may result in a passport issuance for your child without your consent.

Passports - General Information

A passport is a travel document issued by competent authority showing the bearer’s origin, identity, and nationality, which is valid for the entry of the bearer into a foreign country (8 United States C 1101(3)).

Under United States law, U.S. citizens must enter and depart the U.S. with valid U. S. passports (8 United States C 1185(b)). This requirement is waived, however, for travel from countries within the Western Hemisphere, with the exception of Cuba (22 CFR 53.2). However, each foreign country has its own entry requirements concerning citizenship, passports and visas.

Information regarding those requirements may be obtained from the appropriate foreign embassy or consulate. The addresses and telephone numbers for the foreign embassy or consulate near you are found in our Foreign Entry Requirements .

The Privacy Act and Passports

Passport information is protected by the provisions of the Privacy Act (PL 93-579) passed by Congress in 1974. Information regarding a minor’s passport is available to either parent. Information regarding adults may be available to law enforcement officials or pursuant to a court order issued by the court of competent jurisdiction in accordance with (22 CFR 51.27). If you want us to forward to the Foreign Embassy the information contained in your request to the Office of Children’s Issues, please complete and sign the Foreign Embassy Contact Form. That form contains a waiver of your Privacy Act Rights and the rights of your minor children. For further information regarding the issuance or denial of United States passports to minors involved in custody disputes, or about international child abduction, please contact us at (888)407-4747 (this is a recorded message which provides access to country officers).

General passport information is available on our home page. While we make every effort to be of assistance, the Office of Children's Issues can assume no legal responsibility for the services provided.

Dual Nationality for Children

Many children, whether born in the United States or born abroad to a United States citizen parent, are citizens of both the United States and another country. This may occur through the child’s birth abroad, through a parent who was born outside the United States, or a parent who has acquired a second nationality through naturalization in another country. There is no requirement that a United States citizen parent consent to the acquisition of another nationality.

The inability to obtain a United States passport through the Children’s Passport Issuance Alert Program does not automatically prevent a dual national child from obtaining and traveling on a foreign passport. There is no requirement that foreign embassies adhere to United States regulations regarding issuance and denial of their passports to United States citizen minors who have dual nationality. If there is a possibility that the child has another nationality, you may contact the country’s embassy or consulate directly to inquire about denial of that country’s passport. The addresses and telephone numbers for the foreign embassy or consulate near you are found in our Foreign Entry Requirements .

More information about the child-related services available to parents through the Bureau of Consular Affairs is available by calling the Office of Children’s Issues at (888)407-4747 and speaking to an officer who deals with a specific country. There is more information about the prevention of International Parental Child Abduction .

SOURCE: U.S. State Department

April 06, 2008

Modification of Custody or Visitation in a Georgia Divorce

These frequently asked questions explain your options for changing an established custody or visitation agreement.

Under what circumstances can custody and visitation orders be changed within the state where they were obtained?

After a final decree of divorce or other order establishing custody and visitation (such as a paternity decree) is filed with a court, parents may agree to modify the custody or visitation terms. This modified agreement (also called a "stipulated modification") may be made without court approval. If one parent later reneges on the agreement, however, the other person may not be able to enforce it unless the court has approved the modification. Thus, it is generally advisable to obtain a court's blessing before relying on such agreements. Courts usually approve modification agreements unless it appears that they are not in the best interests of the child.

If a parent wants to change an existing court order and the other parent won't agree to the change, he or she must file a motion (a written request) asking the court that issued the order to modify it. Usually, courts will modify an existing order only if the parent asking for the change can show a "substantial change in circumstances." This requirement encourages stability of arrangements and helps prevent the court from becoming overburdened with frequent and repetitive modification requests.

What qualifies as a substantial change in circumstances?

Here are some examples:

Geographic move. If a custodial parent makes a significant move, or the move will seriously disrupt the stability of the child's life, the move may constitute a changed circumstance that justifies the court's modification of a custody or visitation order. Some courts switch custody from one parent to the other, although the increasingly common approach is to ask the parents to work out a plan under which both parents may continue to have significant contacts with their children. If no agreement is reached, courts in some states will permit the move unless it is shown that the child will be adversely affected. In other states, courts will carefully examine the best interests of the child and make a decision about which parent should have custody.

Change in lifestyle. Changes in custody or visitation orders may be obtained if substantial changes in a parent's lifestyle threatens or harms the child. If, for example, a custodial parent begins working at night and leaving a nine-year-old child alone, the other parent may request a change in custody. Similarly, if a noncustodial parent begins drinking heavily or taking drugs, the custodial parent may file a request for modification of the visitation order (asking, for example, that visits occur when the parent is sober, or in the presence of another adult). What constitutes a lifestyle sufficiently detrimental to warrant a change in custody or visitation rights varies tremendously depending on the state and the particular judge deciding the case.

SOURCE: Georgia Divorce Online

April 04, 2008

Clients Can Help - 14 Tips for the Client Going Through a Divorce

Like most litigants, the end result and the cost of legal representation are among the most important concerns of anyone involved in a family law dispute. With these concerns in mind, clients frequently ask me if there is anything they can or should be doing to reduce the time I need to spend on their case or to help move things forward. The answer is a resounding “Yes!”  Here are 14 tips on how to be a good family law client and, at the same time, help your attorney achieve the best possible result without incurring excessive cost:

  1. In advance of the first meeting with your attorney, assemble as much relevant documentation as possible. For instance, in a typical divorce case, this would include (at a minimum) complete copies of recent tax returns, pay stubs for both you and your spouse, a detailed list of all assets and liabilities, and any legal paperwork already filed and/or served upon you.
  2. Speaking of documentation, organize every piece of paper that you give to your attorney. Documents should be stapled, labeled and assembled in an orderly fashion. Keep in mind that your attorney and his/her staff will do whatever is necessary to organize the documentation that you provide to him/her if you don't do so. It will, however, take time and cost money.
  3. Keep a detailed diary of all significant events pertaining to your case and make sure to share copies with your attorney. A "Week-at-a-Glance" calendar often serves this purpose well. This may be especially important in a custody case. Your memory may fade with time, but a well-kept diary can be used to refresh your recollection prior to and/or during a hearing. Additionally, your attorney can use your diary to assist in preparing your testimony in advance of a hearing.
  4. A picture is worth a thousand words. Besides documenting things in your diary, document what you can with photographs and/or videos. For instance, if you decide to move out of the marital residence, take photographs of the condition of the residence and all property that you left behind.
  5. Ask questions. There is no such thing as a stupid question. More often than not, questions from clients are highly relevant and serve as a basis for helping to frame out the issues and develop strategies.
  6. If you need to discuss non-legal issues with someone, you may not want to call your attorney. His/her hourly rate is probably much higher than a therapist's, and the therapist probably is better equipped to handle the issue. While your attorney may be a very good listener, it will be to your economic and emotional advantage to discuss non-legal issues with your therapist, family members, friends, priest, rabbi, pastor, etc.
  7. Do your best to pay your attorney’s bills on a timely basis. If you cannot pay a bill within a reasonable amount of time, call your attorney and ask to work out some payment arrangements. If you are making a genuine effort, most attorneys will be understanding and work with you.
  8. Promptly respond to calls and inquiries from your attorney. If it was not important, your attorney would not be contacting you. Furthermore, if you are not being responsive to your attorney, he/she will have no choice but to spend his/her time and your money trying to get a response.
  9. When you leave a message for your attorney (either on voicemail or through a secretary) leave your phone number and the time when you will be available to speak. While your attorney likely has your number, it will take less time for your attorney to call you back if he/she does not have to find your number. This is especially true if your attorney is not in his/her office.
  10. If you have left messages for your attorney and have not received a response in a reasonable period of time, realize that there is probably a good reason why he/she has not returned your call (i.e., tied up in court or meetings, or handling an emergency situation). If the reason for your call is of an urgent nature, do not hesitate to explain the situation to your attorney’s secretary and/or ask if you can speak with another attorney in the firm. If your call is not urgent, ask your attorney’s secretary when she expects the attorney to be available so that you can call again or ask if an appointment can be placed in the attorney’s calendar for a phone conference.
  11. Do not believe everything that you hear from your spouse, family and friends as it pertains to your case and the law. Even though your spouse may act like he/she is trying to be accommodating, the reality is that he/she is likely out to get the best possible result for himself/herself. Similarly, realize that every case is different. Just because your friend’s cousin got a particular result does not mean that you will get a similar result.
  12. Do not sign or agree to anything without first speaking with your attorney. Attorneys are usually in favor of parties speaking and trying to reach amicable resolutions between themselves. An attorney, however, can and will help you determine if the terms discussed are in your best interest. There is nothing wrong with telling the opposing party that you need some time to think about it and will get back to them after speaking with your attorney. If the opposing party is pushing you to sign something on the spot, be suspect.
  13. Be discreet and resist the urge to deliberately annoy or antagonize your spouse. If you do or say something that you know will annoy your spouse, be prepared for appropriate retaliation. Also be prepared to pay your attorney who will, no doubt, get a call from the opposing counsel when your spouse calls to complain about your behavior.
  14. Last, but not least, be candid and truthful with your attorney. Attorneys do not like surprises. If your Attorney is well-informed, he/she can be fully prepared to deal with potentially damaging information if and when it is raised by the other side.

SOURCE FOR POST: Pennsylvania Family Law Blog

Estate Planning and Divorce

Hamill14forweb Leanna Hamill of the Massachusetts Estate Planning and Elder Law Blog has recently posted two useful and informative articles (Part 1 and Part 2) about Estate Planning and Divorce, which I have combined in this post:

If you are separated from your spouse, filing for divorce, or even just contemplating it - you need more than just a divorce attorney.  You need to visit with an estate planning attorney to make some critical changes to your estate plan before and after the divorce.  This post will deal with changes than can be made before the divorce, and the next post will be about changes to make after the divorce. 

  1. If you have signed a health care proxy naming your spouse as the person to make medical decisions for you, you should revoke it and sign a new one appointing someone else.   Notify your spouse that you have revoked the HCP naming them.  Make sure that anyone who knows of the old HCP (such as your doctor) is given a new one.  If you have not signed a HCP, sign one, and make sure your doctor has a copy and carry a card in your wallet indicating who your new health care agent is, and where your HCP is located.
  2. Remove your spouse from any Power of Attorney documents that you've signed appointing them and notify any entities that may have received a copy of the old Power of Attorney so they know it has been changed.  The POA is a powerful document which can give the holder the right to access bank accounts that are in your name alone, get financial and sometimes medical information about you and even sell real estate that is your name.  It is vital that you sign a new one if you do not want your spouse to have this power. 

During this time you should also be thinking about your estate plan after your divorce. If you would not want your former spouse to be in charge of the money that you will leave to your minor children, you will need to set up a trust, with someone else as trustee.  This can be a sibling, parent, friend or even a bank or other financial institution.  Your estate planning attorney can explain what the responsibilities of the trustee are, so that you can make the best choice, and can help you determine when the best time to sign the new documents are.

____________________________________________________________

You are nearing the end of your divorce, the final hearing or settlement is in sight.  The last thing you want to do is hire another attorney, write another check out of your bank account which may have taken quite a hit during the divorce.  But, you must.  You need to see an estate planning attorney, to make sure that those things you fought for in the divorce are protected, and that your wishes are honored.   And, rest assured, visits with an estate planning attorney do not involve any court visits, there are no "opposing parties" and generally estate planning attorneys do not charge by the hour. 

You should meet with your estate planning attorney to form your plan before the final divorce hearing, so that the documents can be signed as soon as possible after the final hearing.  This is because during the 90 days after the final hearing, you are still married, and if you pass away during this time without a new plan in place, your soon0-to-be-former spouse could inherit everything.

After your divorce, in addition to signing your new estate planning documents, you should also make sure that you have changed the beneficiaries on any life insurance policies, 401(k) plans, IRAs, and any other accounts that may have had your former spouse listed.  If you have set up a trust, your estate planning attorney can assist you in making sure that the trust is properly named as the beneficiary of these accounts.

SOURCE FOR POST: Massachusetts Estate Planning and Elder Law Blog

Download free Collaborative Divorce Knowledge Kit

Iacpedubrochurelogosm The International Academy of Collaborative Professionals wants you to discover the collaborative process and whether collaborative divorce is right for you. To that end and for a limited time, the IACP has created a kit that answers many of the common questions about collaborative divorce and has the kit available for download.

For a limited time, the International Academy of Collaborative Professionals (IACP) is offering a free, downloadable "Collaborative Divorce Knowledge Kit". The kit is designed for individuals unsure of the Collaborative divorce model. It explains the non-court Collaborative process and includes a "Litigation Divorce vs. Collaborative Divorce" chart that directly compares the two models and recent case studies.

In the Oscar-award winning movie "Juno," the husband (played by Jason Bateman) said, "We can get a Collaborative divorce. I hear it's all the rage." He's right. There are twenty times more collaborative professionals now than just ten years ago. And this explosion is changing how people get divorced from Canada to the Far East.

One reason is people appreciate how Collaborative divorce keeps the process out of the courtroom and lets the people involved maintain control of the entire process. The result: a mutually beneficial outcome for all parties - especially the children.

Another benefit: considerably less emotional stress during and after the divorce.

But is a Collaborative divorce a viable alternative to a litigated divorce? The answer is available in a downloadable, free kit called the "Collaborative Divorce Knowledge Kit." This kit was created by the International Academy of Collaborative Professionals (IACP). IACP is an international non-profit organization dedicated to educating the public and professionals about Collaborative Practice.

The free "Collaborative Divorce Knowledge Kit" explains how the collaborative model works and what to expect from the process. It includes case studies of families who chose collaboration and their outcomes. Plus it contains a convenient chart directly comparing collaboration to litigation.

This comprehensive kit is available free for a limited time through the International Academy of Collaborative Professionals (IACP) website at: www.collaborativepractice.com/kit.

For more about the Collaborative divorce process, please refer to the attached article "Collaborative Divorce - Redefining Families Instead of Breaking them Apart".

Discover if the collaborative model is right for you. Download your free Collaborative Divorce Knowledge Kit.

This kit answers many of the common questions about Collaborative Practice.

You'll also learn about real families -- families like yours -- who used the Collaborative model. And see how it benefited them.

To find out more, download your kit right now.

SOURCES FOR POST: Domestic Diversions and International Academy of Collaborative Professionals and EMediaWire

A Woman's View of Prenuptial Agreements

Sam Hasler, of the Indiana Divorce & Family Law Blog posted this week about an article on Prenuptials on Mom.Dad.Chat blog and commented on it. Both were interesting, so I am reposting them here. First the Prenuptials article:

We all know that many wealthy and famous couples actually draw up prenuptial agreements prior to getting married. How much each party is entitled to should the marriage ends in divorce in terms of cash and assets are spelled out in clear terms.

But nowadays, it seems that not only the rich and famous are signing prenuptial agreements. Even ordinary couples are drawing up prenuptials prior to walking down the aisle.

What are the pros or advantages of a prenuptial agreement?

  • All money and assets are out in the open.
  • Rights of both parties can be protected, including that of children and step-children.
  • Responsibility and expectations of each party can be spelled out.
  • No messy divorce to contend with if the relationship sours.

The cons or disadvantages of a prenup are:

  • Takes the romantic notion out of the relationship.
  • The element of trust seems to be missing between the couple.
  • When you are deeply in love, you may agree to something that may not necessarily be fair to you.
  • Nobody can predict the fortunes of a couple. If your spouse’s net worth have increased during the years of your marriage, you will be limiting yourself to the agreed upon amount previously.

In these days of high divorce rates, a prenuptial agreement seems like a practical thing to have. Personally, if I’m a 30 something year old woman who have tons more money than my prospective husband, I too would probably want to have a prenuptial agreement drawn up. Who knows if the man is a gold-digger, right?

But funnily, if it is the other way round, I think I might just get offended if asked to sign one. Not only it pains me to learn that he doesn’t seem to have faith in the relationship, it is equally hurtful to know that he cares for his money more than me! But then again, if I truly love him and not after his money, it follows that I should not mind signing a prenuptial, right?

Well, maybe we all like to say that we don’t care about money but the reality may be very different indeed. So, what would you do - would you say bye-bye to someone who makes you sign a prenuptial agreement?

And here is Sam's comment:

Some insights gained from reading :

In these days of high divorce rates, a prenuptial agreement seems like a practical thing to have. Personally, if I’m a 30 something year old woman who have tons more money than my prospective husband, I too would probably want to have a prenuptial agreement drawn up. Who knows if the man is a gold-digger, right?

But funnily, if it is the other way round, I think I might just get offended if asked to sign one. Not only it pains me to learn that he doesn’t seem to have faith in the relationship, it is equally hurtful to know that he cares for his money more than me! But then again, if I truly love him and not after his money, it follows that I should not mind signing a prenuptial, right?

Lawyers love the idea of prenuptial agreements because we see them as innocuous compared to the perils of divorce. Real people see them a little differently. We, the lawyers, need to adjust our expectations and work on educating the potential clients.
SOURCES FOR POST: Mom.Dad.Chat  and Sam Hasler's Indiana Divorce & Family Law Blog

April 03, 2008

Serb ex-wife gets half of everything — literally

Man uses grinding machine to cut farm tools, machines in half for divorce

BELGRADE, Serbia - A Serb farmer used a grinding machine to cut in half his farm tools and machines to comply with a court ruling that he must share all his property with his ex-wife, local media reported on Thursday.

Branko Zivkov, 76, told Belgrade daily Kurir he had been ready to give his wife Vukadinka her equal share of everything earned during their 45-year marriage, but was furious at being asked to give away half his farming equipment.

Instead, he bought a grinder and cut in two all his tools.

The halved equipment included large items such as cattle scales, a harrow and a sowing machine.

"I still haven't decided how to split the cow," he told the newspaper. "She should just say what she wants — the part with the horns or the part with the tail."

SOURCE: MSNBC.com

April 02, 2008

Is Work Or A Divorce Keeping You From Your Child?

320covers_page_1 I have posted previously on software and other tools to help parents and children of dvorce keep up with schedules and improve communication. This is a similar product which deserves a look:

For parents burdened by a divorce or a heavy workload, it is becoming increasingly difficult to stay in touch with their children and each other. Visitation rights might decree that a parent only gets to see a child every other weekend, or perhaps the parent returns home from the office so late each night that their kids are already asleep. Additionally, children themselves are becoming busier and busier - extra academic studies after school, practice with the sports team - which further reduces the contact between parent and child. Whatever the reasons, a communication chasm is appearing between many parents and their children.

Community advocate and business owner Sheila Butler found that - like the parents in many of the other 40 million other 'broken' families across America - daily communication with her spouse about their children became next to impossible following her divorce two years ago.

"There were times when communication with my ex was difficult at best," recalls Sheila. "The question I kept asking myself was 'How are we both ever going to keep up with what's going on in our kids' lives?' but there was no solution available."

With necessity so often being the mother of invention, this mother of two set out to find her own solution, and in so doing developed the 'Kids in Motion Planner' (www.kidsinmotionplanner.com) to help her - and the millions like her - stay in touch with their current or ex-spouses concerning the kids.

Sheila offers parents the following tips:

1. Keep an ongoing involvement in your children's lives.

2. Try and have a window of information into your kids' everyday schedules and developments.

3. Keep an open line of communication, not just between the child and parent, but also the two parents themselves.

4. Give your kids an added 'security blanket' by letting them see that Mom and Dad are cooperating and interested in their development.

5. Enhance the safety nets - parents must stay in contact regarding important changes in their child's life; such as a change in medication.

6. Give children a sense of purpose. Knowing that there are expectations on their parents as well as themselves gives kids purpose and an increased feeling of success when objectives were reached.

Since developing the 'Kids in Motion Planner' (www.kidsinmotionplanner.com) Sheila has become even closer with her 9 year old daughter, and keeps up to date better than ever before with her 20 year old son, who is constantly traveling with the military.

"From my own experience and from the feedback I've received from others, the 'Kids in Motion Planner' has proven to be a highly successful tool for families," she says, "and I mean the whole family - to our knowledge this is the first time anyone has involved the child in the issue of divorce and shared custody in a positive manner."

Although being a divorced or overworked parent is never easy for a family, a little extra communication between parents and their children, and with some simple organizational tools, all families can enjoy closer, more loving, and healthy relationships, no matter what life throws at them.

SOURCE: NewsBlaze and KidsInMotionPlanner.com

A YouTube video on the product, as featured on Atlanta & Company appears below:

Related Posts:

Shared Parenting Custody Calendar Software

Think outside the box for parent-child communications

Virtual Visitation: Webcams and Weekly Visits

Women M.B.A.s More Likely To Divorce Than Men

Dreamstime_3174377 According to a soon-to-be-published study by Washington & Lee University School of Law and reported in the Wall St. Journal, women with M.B.A.s are twice as likely to get divorced or separated as their male counterparts. In short, a professional degree is often hazardous to marital health. According to the study:

Women with M.B.A.s described themselves as divorced or separated more often than women with only bachelor's degrees (12% of female M.B.A.s compared with 11% of women with only bachelor's degrees) and more than twice as often as men with M.B.A.s (5% of whom reported being divorced or separated).

The study's author believes that the root cause is that highly successful women "can't summon up the TLC and support that high-earning men need." Her advice, according to the WSJ story, is that " Well-educated, highly compensated women should be targeting particularly loving and supportive men."

Anyone familiar with statistics will know that while accurate conclusions can be drawn against populations, it is dangerous and inappropriate to attempt to apply so conclusions to specific individuals or families--especially for something as complex as marital success.

SOURCE: Wall Street Journal  (article by Anita Raghavan reprinted below)

SOURCE FOR POST: LifeTwo.com

Related Posts:

Ex-husbands can cash in

Women Increasingly Paying Alimony

Supporting the Ex-Husband

Alimony - Prenups for Women

Continue reading "Women M.B.A.s More Likely To Divorce Than Men" »

April 01, 2008

Georgia, South Carolina Make Top 10 Most Violent States Against Women

Dreamstime_4038158 One day after a domestic violence murder in South Augusta, the Violence Policy Center has unflattering statistics for our area.

The center says South Carolina is number six, and Georgia is number eight in the country for the number of women murdered by men.

Domestic violence counselors are calling on the community for help.

Yellow police tape surrounded the home where investigators say Calvin Foster Senior shot his wife, Daphne, five times Tuesday morning - killing her in a fit of rage.

It's logged as another statistic downtown, but one of rising concern to domestic violence counselors, like Rae Brammer who's disappointed with what she calls "lackluster efforts" to stop the problem.

"What are we telling people," Brammer asks, "that we can look the other way and it's not our problem? I think Augusta's looked the other way too long."

Maggie Tucker agrees. As Assistant Director of a shelter for domestic violence victims, she's worried about the increasing number of people who don't act when they should.

"Always a friend knew," she says of past victims who died at the hands of their domestic attacker. "There was some person that knew. So I think it's every body's responsibility."

But both Brammer and Tucker agree - helping a victim leave a bad situation is both difficult and dangerous.

"That's when the batterer will go into a rage," Tucker admits. "That's when a lot of women are killed - after they leave."

Still, they say, reporting domestic problems is the only way to stop a cycle of violence that Brammer says is passed from one generation to the next.

"If you care about children and if you care about the next generation, it's your problem."

In the report, 90 women were murdered in Georgia in domestic incidents. 90% of them knew their killer.

South Carolina saw 47 women murdered by men. 91% were killed by someone they knew.

Rankings are based on murders per 100,000 people. Georgia's population is larger than South Carolina's. That's why South Carolina is ranked higher.

SOURCE: NBCAugusta.com in a story by Joshua Quinn

Frequently Asked Questions about Marital Separation Agreements in Georgia

Dreamstime_1453108 What is a Marital Separation and Property Settlement Agreement?

A marital separation agreement, also known as a property settlement agreement, is a written contract dividing your property, spelling out your rights, and settling problems such as alimony and custody. A marital separation agreement may be drawn before or after you have filed for divorce — even while you and your spouse are still living together.

When you initially execute a marital separation agreement you usually do not have to file the separation agreement with the court to be effective.

When and if you begin the divorce proceedings, you will attach the separation agreement to your divorce papers and ask the court to merge, but not incorporate, the agreement into the final judicial decree.  If the marital separation agreement is incorporated into the decree, it becomes a court order and is enforceable by the court.  If you don't incorporate the separation agreement into your decree, it simply becomes a contract or agreement between you and your spouse.

Why is a Marital settlement agreement important?

If you have no marital property, no joint debts, and no children, you probably don't need a marital separation agreement to get a no-fault divorce. However, if you want to provide for the future governance of your relationship, as well as provide additional evidence to the court about the day that you separated, you should have a Marital Settlement Agreement. An agreement leaves no doubt about the details of the ending of your marriage relationship. It is better to have a clearly written agreement, rather than rely on verbal understandings.

In Georgia, if you have a Marital Settlement  Agreement your divorce pleadings will be simpler and less complicated and it will be absolutely clear to the court that you have an uncontested divorce.

Do I have to file a Marital Settlement Agreement with the court?

When you initially execute your Marital Settlement Agreement you do not have to file the Agreement with the Court to be effective. When you begin the divorce proceedings you will attach the Marital Settlement Agreement to the complaint and ask the court to merge, but not incorporate, the Agreement into the final judicial decree. If the Marital Settlement  Agreement is incorporated into the decree, it becomes a court order and is enforceable by the court's contempt powers. If you don't incorporate it into the decree, it simply becomes a contract between you and your spouse, which you later have to sue in a separate action to enforce. If the separation agreement is not incorporated into the divorce decree, and your spouse violates the agreement you can still seek money damages for the violation of the agreement, but it is easier and faster if the agreement is incorporated into the divorce decree.

What is the difference between a contested or uncontested divorce?

Divorces are either contested or uncontested. Contested divorces are those in which the respondent disputes any issue in the case - the divorce itself, the property division, child custody, alimony, etc. Uncontested divorces fall into two categories - (1) Consent Divorces - the parties agree on all major issues; and (2) Default causes - where the respondent fails to appear to contest the divorce or any issue in it, either because he or she chooses not to oppose it, or because he or she cannot be located.  By entering into a Marital Settlement  Agreement you make your divorce an uncontested divorce.

How long are the parties bound by a Marital Settlement Agreement?

A separation agreement is a legal document that will bind you through many years and determine your rights, obligations, and responsibilities from your marriage. You and your spouse can amend the agreement if you both consent to the changes; or it can be modified by a court order, provided the agreement does not specifically state that the agreement is not subject to any court modification. Nevertheless, the court can always modify provisions in an agreement regarding the care and custody of any minor children.

Do the courts review the fairness of a Marital Property Settlement Agreement?

In an uncontested divorce, the court nearly always approves the agreement of the parties if it is generally fair and the court is convinced that the agreement was entered into by both spouses without fraud or coercion. Often the court may want to review financial affidavits attached to the agreement in order to determine its fairness.

In negotiating your agreement, you should be guided by how a court is likely to divide your property, award custody and child support, and deal with other issues.

What is the difference between "marital property" and "non-marital property"?

In an "equitable distribution state" state, like Georgia, all property acquired during the marriage is "marital property" and all property is divided into marital property (which means it is both yours and your spouse's) and non-marital property ( which means the property belongs to either you or your spouse alone). I general the following rules apply which categorizing property into "marital" or "non-marital property":

1. If the asset or debt was acquired after the date you were married it is presumed to be a marital asset or debt.

2. A non-marital asset or debt is one that was acquired before the date of your marriage. It is also a non-marital asset if you acquired it through a gift or inheritance. Income from non-marital property is also considered non-marital property.

3. Even if an assets or debt was acquired by your spouse individually, it is considered to be a marital asset or debt, if acquired during the marriage. This includes rights in pension and profit-sharing plans.

4.Real estate that is in both names is considered marital property.

How is property divided in Georgia?

In Georgia, the basic rule is that all marital property is divided equitably. In December 1980, the Georgia Supreme Court decided the case of Stokes v. Stokes 246 GA 765 (1980).  The case concerned the property rights of the parties in a divorce action. The court held that the couple's marital property should be divided euitably between them. Each party can retain any property that he or she owned prior to the marriage. It doesn't matter in whose name or names the marital property is listed. If the property was acquired after the marriage and is therefore marital property it must be divided equitably.

To divide marital property, the court or a jury must consider:

  • length of the marriage;

  • the age, health, occupation, vocational skills, and employability of each party;

  • the service contributed by each spouse to the family unit;

  • the amount and sources of income, property, debts, liabilities, and needs of the parties;

  • debts against the property; whether the division is instead of, or in addition to , alimony;

  • and the opportunity of each spouse to earn money or acquire property in the future.

Another financial issue involves debts that must be paid. The court may divide the responsibility for the debts, or it may order one or the other party to ay all debts.

SOURCE: Georgia Divorce Online

Men Receiving Alimony Want A Little Respect

Modern Males Say Living Off the Ex-Wife Is No Cause for Shame

As a Hollywood actor, John David Castellanos is protective of his image. He stays in phenomenal shape and looks much younger than his 50 years.

But he admits to a fact that might be considered unflattering: He receives alimony from his former wife. To be exact, $9,000 a month.

"The law provides" for it, says Mr. Castellanos, who for years starred in the soap opera "The Young and the Restless."

In the nearly 30 years since the U.S. Supreme Court ruled against gender discrimination in alimony, few male beneficiaries have stepped forward to talk about it. Those who did typically went by pseudonyms or the golden rule of 12-step recovery: first names only.

Little wonder, considering the attention that has come to some former husbands of alimony-paying celebrities. "Why the courts don't tell a husband, who has been living off his wife, to go out and get a job is beyond my comprehension," Joan Lunden, the television personality, said in 1992 when a court ordered her to pay her ex-husband $18,000 a month.

But today's men are shaking off the stigma of being supported by their ex-wives. Several agreed to talk on the record for this article, in part because they say the popular image of the male alimony recipient is unfair: He's not always a slacker.

Mr. Castellanos says he has acted in or produced five movies since the breakup of his marriage, including a couple of projects that he says are nearing completion. If any of these projects strike gold, he says he would gladly forgo alimony. Even Ms. Lunden has had a change of heart. Through a former publicist, she now says of her 1992 comment: "That was a statement made in haste many years ago. I regret having said it."

Divorce experts say that fewer and fewer men are rejecting outright any talk of seeking alimony. The percentage of alimony recipients who are male rose to 3.6% during the five years ending in 2006, up from 2.4%, in the previous five-year period, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.

That percentage is likely to rise as more and more marriages feature a primary earner who is female. In 2005 (the latest year for which data are available), wives outearned their husbands in 33% of all families, up from 28.2% a decade earlier.

Alimony -- a distinctly different category from child support -- is the money that higher-earning spouses hand to their lower-earning counterparts following the end of their marriage. Often it is court-ordered, years in duration and based on big discrepancies in spousal incomes.

Classic Reasons

Today, men in growing numbers are receiving alimony for the classic reasons that women traditionally did. A common argument is that they sacrificed their careers for the sake of their wives'.

"If it was not for the joint decision to support Marjorie's career advancement to the detriment of mine, I would be making considerably more money than I am currently," Christopher Bowen argued in a 2005 filing in Los Angeles Superior Court.

At the time of that request, Mr. Bowen was a Wachovia Securities executive receiving about $550,000 in annual pay, according to the court documents. But his wife, Marjorie Bowen, was expected in 2005 to earn $1.5 million as an executive at investment-banking boutique Houlihan Lokey Howard & Zukin, according to the court documents.

Mr. Bowen argued in the filing that when the couple moved back to Los Angeles because of her career opportunities, he took a cut in pay. "Based on my salary alone, I cannot maintain the marital standard of living," Mr. Bowen wrote in a petition filed in the Los Angeles court in August 2005.

Continue reading "Men Receiving Alimony Want A Little Respect" »

March 28, 2008

Joint or Sole Custody?

For the sake of the children, the goals of divorcing parents should be the same: involvement of both parents in the lives of the children and mitigation of conflict between the parents. These two factors should dominate all others when thinking about custody.

A joint custody solution gives a psychological boost to the parent who would otherwise be the noncustodial parent. But, even in a sole-custody situation, generous time-sharing (combined with open communication between parents) can create an environment where a noncustodial parent is significantly involved in the children's lives.

Is joint custody right for you? That depends a great deal on the ability of you and your spouse to get along. If you are to share decision-making, you must be able to sit down with your former spouse in a noncombative atmosphere and make decisions together. Shared values and parenting styles make this custody style more viable.

Here's what psychologists have found after long-term studies of families in joint custody and sole custody arrangements:

  • Joint custody is a viable option only if the parents have an amicable relationship with each other, communicate well, and understand the nuances of their kid's day-to-day routines. Parents in this situation feel more involved in their children's lives than the noncustodial parent in the sole custody arrangement. On the other hand, in a family where one parent says “black” and the other parent says “white,” the children are better off with a sole custody arrangement to reduce the possibility that their parents will fight over every decision that must be made on their behalf.

  • For parents not on friendly terms, joint legal custody, that is to say, joint decision-making, means more room for disagreement and continuation of conflict. These parents are more likely to return to court than parents who have one decision-maker (sole custody).

  • If you're able to communicate about the kids, are willing to live in close proximity to your ex, and have the time and resources to share “possession and access” (as they say in Texas) or “physical custody” (as it's more commonly called), then it can be a great thing for everyone. But generally, only children who tend to be easy-going by nature can adapt well to this kind of living arrangement. Children who do poorly with constant change, have difficulty adjusting to new situations, and seem to need a great deal of stability and security in their lives don't do well with joint physical custody.

In short, if you can agree to most of the following statements, joint custody could work for your family:

  • I will communicate openly with my ex-spouse regarding the children's needs and activities.

  • I can be flexible in working with my ex-spouse and put my children's needs first.

  • I will never bad-mouth my ex-spouse in front of my children. On the contrary, I will show nothing but respect for my children's other parent.

  • I will respect my ex-spouse's right to have his or her own house rules and not undermine them.

Be honest with yourself. If your feelings don't allow you to accept these guidelines, then get some counseling. If that doesn't work, then joint custody is not a good choice for your family.

SOURCE: FamilyEducation.com

IRS Declares Spouses More Innocent Than Before

Dreamstime_117654 The innocent spouse rules have been liberalized in new tax legislation, making it easier for spouses to qualify for tax relief. In addition, the legislation allows a spouse to limit her liability on a joint return to her separate liability. This is a boon to separated spouses who continue to file joint returns with their spouses, and it offers greater protection to divorced spouses who face liability for taxes on returns they jointly filed during marriage.

The innocent spouse provisions provide tax relief to a spouse who jointly files with her husband (or vice versa) if there was a tax understatement attributable to her spouse and she did not know about the understatement when she signed the return, nor did she have reason to know of the tax understatement. If she knew there was an understatement but didn’t realize the extent of the understatement, she may be granted partial relief.

Under new Internal Revenue Code Sec. 6015, a spouse can now elect to limit her liability for unpaid taxes on a joint return to her separate liability amount. That amount is the tax on items that would have been allocated to her had she filed a separate return. There’s one catch though – any item of which the spouse had actual knowledge is allocable to both spouses. The good news is that the IRS must prove that she had knowledge of the misstatement or omission that caused the deficiency.